It's a great write up. Thanks for sharing with us. I am a Duolingo holder for a while. Obviously bought at $350 levels. I'm still holding, but you have the courage to add more but I don't have the courage to add more.
I haven't used Duolingo, but for my child, I use the chess course from Duolingo, and she's in year 4. She used it for a few days, maybe 3-4 weeks. What she found is that the learning level or the level of learning is very basic, and we didn't renew or we didn't pay for the subscription after few weeks because what we found is that it is too basic to actually learn.
But I think you have captured that comment for languages as well where it is just 160 level vs 60 level. Again, thank you for sharing this note.
Pleasure! I think chess is at it's very beginning and it only shows duolingo's teams capacity to innovate and bring new subjects rapidly. They'll need time to perfection their classes, but the potential definitely is here!
It's a great write up. Thanks for sharing with us. I am a Duolingo holder for a while. Obviously bought at $350 levels. I'm still holding, but you have the courage to add more but I don't have the courage to add more.
I haven't used Duolingo, but for my child, I use the chess course from Duolingo, and she's in year 4. She used it for a few days, maybe 3-4 weeks. What she found is that the learning level or the level of learning is very basic, and we didn't renew or we didn't pay for the subscription after few weeks because what we found is that it is too basic to actually learn.
But I think you have captured that comment for languages as well where it is just 160 level vs 60 level. Again, thank you for sharing this note.
Pleasure! I think chess is at it's very beginning and it only shows duolingo's teams capacity to innovate and bring new subjects rapidly. They'll need time to perfection their classes, but the potential definitely is here!